
September 24 – 25, 2025
Venue: T-REX
8:00 a.m.
8:45 a.m.
SESSION 1
9:00 a.m.
Registration / Continental Breakfast
Welcome
Mr. William “Bill” Caniano
Executive Roundtable – Geospatial AI Strategy
Moderators
With a growing number of national security challenges, it is imperative that the implementation of Foundation Digital Twins is fully explored and understood in the context of AI. Designing GeoAI systems that will scale with greatest challenges will require engaging the frontlines and visionary societal perspectives for guidance. Join us in this session for a forward framing of the geospatial AI strategy as a bridge toward uncovering unlimited possibilities for impacting national security mission challenges and challenges for our nation’s benefit.
Key Questions
What are the emerging program priorities that are going to set the Geospatial AI Strategy for the next 3-5 years? How would you assess your organization’s progress today? What priority should we tackle first next after this conference?
Given the scale of data envisioned, and the increasing demands for real-time GEOINT, what specific changes to current investment strategies in computing infrastructure (cloud, edge, quantum) are needed to ensure that Foundation Digital Twins can be realistically deployed and utilized operationally within the next 3-5 years for national security missions?
From a programmatic level, do you agree that AI Foundation Models and Geospatial Digital Twins are a paradigm shift for geospatial applications? If so or if not, what benefits (if any) do these technologies bring to your geospatial organization and to the Trillion Pixel Challenge? What downfalls should we also be aware of?
10:30 a.m.
Networking Break
SESSION 2
11:00 a.m.
Data Infrastructure for Foundational Digital Twin (FDT)
Moderators
Dr. Trevor Garner, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
Dr. Lexie Yang, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Dr. Samantha Arundel, U.S. Geological Survey
GEOINT Operational Efficiency will depend on building scientifically grounded and continuously updated digital twins using a dynamic multi-datum geodetic reference framework. The integration of heterogenous global datasets such as GRACE, SWOT, and ICESat-2 into interoperable, geodetically grounded platforms, holds the key to unlock many GEOINT application challenges. In this session we will deep dive into the challenges and visionary solutions to align digital twin platforms with global reference frames and geodetic datums such as ITRF, WGS 84, NATRF2022, and EGM2008. We will discuss why aligning AI systems with global datums and frames, gravity models, and Earth Orientation Parameters (EOPs) is an enabler know the Earth. Panelists will lead the way with grand challenges and visionary solutions toward how these systems can be scaled to support precision, interoperability, and long-term model reliability.
Key Questions
What are the biggest challenges in aligning digital twin platforms with global reference systems
How will geospatial digital twins grounded in global datums improve 1) safety of navigation, 2) national security and 3) disaster response?
What are the grand challenges the Trillion Pixel Challenge community need to solve in the next decade to ensure foundational digital twins deliver their full potential?
How should success for a GEOINT foundation digital twin be quantified to evaluate success five years from now?
12:30 p.m.
Lunch
SESSION 3
2:00 p.m.
World Foundation Models for GeoAI Agents
Moderators
Dr. Dalton Lunga, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Dr. Abby Stylianou, Saint Louis University
The session will spotlight the next generation of geospatial Foundation models that integrate geospatial knowledge, physical processes, temporal dynamics, and human actions to support pressing energy, security, and environmental challenges. We will take inspiration from the NVIDIA Cosmos – a platform for training general purpose World Foundation Models for Physical AI. Physical AI is characterized as an AI system equipped with sensors and actuators: the sensors enable the system to observe the world, and the actuators allow for interacting with and modifying the world. While GeoAI systems are advancing significantly due to vast amounts of Earth observations and compute scaling in the past two decades, its coupling with physical processes, temporal dynamics, and human actions to account for near real-time and real-world updates is lagging. Join us for an open discussion on general-purpose Cosmos-like World Foundation Models for GeoAI and agents to support Geospatial Foundation Digital Twins. We openly ask, how do we go about developing World Foundation Models that incorporate structured reasoning to understand physics and space-time alignment? What role (if any) will virtual AI replicas play in advancing GeoAI agents?
Key Questions
What key considerations should the community make to generate dynamic pretraining data needed to obtain strong priors via geospatial World Foundation Models (GeoWFMs)? How should we approach the scaling challenges for generating such data? How best should physics based reasoning be integrated to support operational Geospatial Digital Twins?
What are the training strategies required to develop virtual replicas of GeoAI models that reflect the dynamic states of our world?
What are the architectural considerations for incorporating physics constraints to spatio-temporal enabled GeoWFMs?
What benchmarks or evaluation frameworks are needed to test GeoAgents across different spatial and temporal scales? How can we measure whether GeoAgents not only give accurate predictions but also provide actionable insights for decision-makers in real-world geospatial tasks? What metrics can capture the adaptability of GeoAgents to new or unseen geospatial events?
3:30 p.m.
Networking Break
SESSION 4
4:00 p.m.
Scalable Computing Infrastructure for Enterprise HPC
Moderators
Dr. Aris Tsaris, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Dr. Valentine Anantharaj, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Mr. Shane McDonald, Amazon Web Services
Toward Enterprise-scale HPC to enable real-time analytics and massive data fusion and analytics. Also considering cloud-native platforms, and emerging quantum architectures to build scalable computing infrastructure for catalyze the development of scalable AI models and workflows.
Key Questions
How is computing infrastructure evolving to support the growing demands of enterprise-scale real-time analytics, data fusion and geocomputation?
As specialized computing hardware evolves, do you see AI workloads becoming more uniform across different domains, or will GeoAI development and applications continue to have distinct infrastructure needs such as energy efficiency?
Can a single computing platform efficiently handle both large-scale GeoAI training and production inference, or do cost, latency, and workload differences still favor specialized setups?
How should organizations balance their investments across on-premises, cloud, and edge computing resources?
5:30 p.m.
End of day
8:00 a.m.
8:45 a.m.
SESSION 5
9:00 a.m.
Arrival / Continental Breakfast
Opening Address
Trustworthiness in GeoAI Systems
Moderators
Dr. Amir Sadvonik, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Advance toward interpretable, secure, and responsible AI for FDT. Enhance transparency and trust to accelerate the adoption and increase impact of GeoAI advances.
Key Questions
Defining & Measuring Trustworthiness: How can we establish clear, measurable standards for “trustworthiness” in GeoAI that address the unique challenges of geospatial data, uncertainty, and biases? What metrics and evaluation frameworks can differentiate objective trustworthiness from subjective user trust?
Explainability Requirements & Trade-offs: How should we define “explainability” for GeoAI systems, and what are the minimum explainability requirements across different operational contexts? When complex models offer superior performance but limited interpretability, what validation approaches can substitute for explainability while maintaining trustworthiness?
Adversarial Threats & Model Robustness: Given the rise generative AI for data generation and the known brittleness of AI models to adversarial attacks throughout the entire machine learning pipeline, what are the main threats to GeoAI systems? Given that models used in the national security domain are expected to be attacked, what evaluations and guardrails should we put in place to ensure the robustness of our AI models to such attacks?
10:30 a.m.
Networking Break
SESSION 6
11:00 a.m.
New Public-Private Partnerships for Accelerated Operational Impact
Moderators
Dr. Aaron Kaulfus, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Dr. Budhu Bhaduri, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Public–private partnership (PPP) models in are designed to harness the strengths of government, academia, and industry to advance AI innovation while ensuring public benefit. Research consortia bring together universities, companies, and government labs to conduct pre-competitive R&D, share expertise, and train the AI workforce. Shared infrastructure partnerships democratize access to high-performance computing, large datasets, and AI tools. Innovation sandboxes and testbeds provide safe, controlled environments where regulators, companies, and startups can experiment with AI in sensitive sectors like healthcare, finance, or defense, accelerating deployment while addressing risk. Co-investment models align government funding with private sector contributions to de-risk early-stage R&D and ensure alignment with national priorities. Finally, data-sharing collaboratives establish trusted frameworks for opening sensitive or proprietary datasets. Collectively, these PPP models expand access to resources, foster responsible AI adoption, and create shared value across sectors, while ensuring AI advances serve both innovation and the public good. This panel will illustrate and highlight the current and emerging models for engaging regional to national geospatial ecosystems of partners to bult innovative public-private partnerships in geospatial and AI technologies by combining the strengths of government, academia, and industry.
Key Questions
How do we best align government mission needs with industry innovation priorities and academic research agendas?
How can PPPs maintain public trust, especially in sensitive domains such as national security?
Are there metrics of success we should consider beyond the usual (scientific breakthroughs, public benefits, workforce development, etc.)?
How do we ensure the outcomes are scalable and widely adopted beyond the initial partners?
Are there opportunities for developing new models for PPP that will benefit the geospatial ecosystem?
12:35 p.m.
Closing Remarks
Dr. Budhu Bhaduri, Oak Ridge National Laboratory